|
The Adams mammoth is the name given to the first complete woolly mammoth skeleton, with skin and flesh still attached, to be recovered by European scientists. The mammoth remains were discovered in 1799 in northeastern Siberia by Ossip Shumachov, an Evenki hunter〔Michael Adams, "Some Account of a Journey to the Frozen-Sea, and of the Discovery of the Remains of a Mammoth." ''The Philadelphia Medical and Physical Journal,'' Part 1, Vol. 3 (1808) pp. 120-137〕 and subsequently recovered in 1806 when Russian botanist Mikhail Adams journeyed to the location and collected the remains. ==Discovery== The first published reports of Siberian mammoth remains appeared in Europe in the 1690s.〔The best known of these accounts was translated into English as Evert Ysbrants Ides, ''Three years travels from Moscow over-land to China : thro’ Great Ustiga, Siriania, Permia, Sibiria, Daour, Great Tartary, etc. to Peking'' (London: W. Freeman, 1705).〕 In 1728, Sir Hans Sloane published what can be considered the first comprehensive scientific paper on mammoths in the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society.〔Hans Sloane, "An Account of Elephants Teeth and Bones Found under Ground," ''Philosophical Transactions,'' Vol. 35, (1727 - 1728), pp. 457-471, and Hans Sloane, "Of Fossile Teeth and Bones of Elephants. Part the Second", ''Philosophical Transactions,'' Vol. 35, (1727 - 1728), pp. 497-514.〕 Sloane's paper was based on travellers' descriptions and a few scattered bones collected in Siberia and Britain. While he discussed the question of whether or not the mammoth was an elephant, he drew no conclusions. In 1738, Johann Philipp Breyne argued that mammoth fossils represented some kind of elephant, but could not explain why a tropical animal would be found in such a cold area as Siberia; he suggested that they might have been transported there by Noah's flood.〔Johann Philip Breyne, "A Letter from John Phil. Breyne, M. D. F. R. S. to Sir Hans Sloane, Bart. Pres. R. S. with Observations and a Description of some Mammoth’s Bones dug up in Siberia, proving them to have belonged to Elephants." ''Philosophical Transactions,'' Vol. 40, (1737 - 1738), pp. 124-39.〕 Between 1692 and 1806, only four descriptions of frozen mammoths—skeletons with skin and flesh still attached—had been published in Europe.〔I. P. Tolmachoff, "The Carcasses of the Mammoth and Rhinoceros Found in the Frozen Ground of Siberia," ''Transactions, American Philosophical Society,'' Vol. 23, (1929), pp. 21-23.〕 None of the remains of those five were recovered and no complete skeleton recovered during that time. By the end of the century, based on this partial data, Georges Cuvier was able to argue conclusively that the Siberian mammoth was a different species than either of the two known species of elephant(). This was the state of affairs when Adams heard about Shumachov's discovery. Adams had come to Siberia in 1805 as part a scientific team attached to Count Yury Golovkin's unsuccessful diplomatic mission to China.〔George Timkowsky and Julius von Klaproth, ''Travels of the Russian Mission through Mongolia to China: and Residence in Peking, in the Years 1820-1821,'' Volume 1, (London: Longman, Rees, Orme, Brown, and Green, 1827), pp. 128-34.〕 After the failure of the mission, several members of the scientific team stayed on in Siberia to conduct research. While in Yakutsk at the beginning of the summer of 1806, Adams heard from an ivory merchant about the frozen mammoth discovered near the Lena Delta. He hired four cossacks and sailed down the Lena to its delta on the Arctic Ocean. At the end of June, he arrived in Shumachov's village and, at the end of July, Adams, Scumachov, and ten men from Shumachov's village journeyed to the mammoth's location.〔Adams' is the only account of the journey and recovery of the mammoth.〕 At first, Adams was disappointed to discover that wild animals had eaten most of the organs and flesh of the mammoth (including the trunk). However, he forgot his disappointment after examining the carcass and realizing that what was left would still be, by far, the most complete mammoth ever recovered. All in all, Adams recovered the entire skeleton, minus the tusks, which Shumachov had already sold, and one foreleg; most of the skin, which he described as "of such an extraordinary weight, that ten persons ... moved it with great difficulty;" and nearly forty pounds of hair. During his return voyage he purchased a pair of tusks that he believed were the same tusks that Shumachov had sold. In St. Petersburg, the task of reassembling the skeleton was given to Wilhelm Gottlieb Tilesius. Tilesius' task was made easier by the fact that the Kunstkamera, the museum established by Peter the Great, contained the skeleton of an Indian elephant that Tilesius was able to use as a reference. Tilesius had wooden replicas made to replace the missing leg bones.〔Tilesio (Wilhelm Gottlieb Tilesius), "De skeleto mammonteo Sibirico ad maris glacialis littora anno 1807 effosso, cui praemissae Elephantini generis specierum distinctiones," ''Mémoires de l'Académie Impériale des Sciences de St. Pétersbourg,'' Vol. 5 (1815), pp. 406-514.〕 His reconstruction was one of the first attempts at reconstructing the skeleton of an extinct animal.〔The first reconstruction was a Megatherium carried out by Juan Bautista Bru in 1795. Martin Rudwick, ''Bursting the Limits of Time: the Reconstruction of Geohistory in the Age of Revolution,'' (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005), pp. 356-57.〕 While most of the reconstruction is correct, Tilesius made a glaring error by mounting the tusks on the wrong sides so that they curved outward instead of inward. The error was not corrected until 1899〔Cohen, Claudine (2002). ''The Fate of the Mammoth: Fossils, Myth, and History.'' Translated by William Rodarmor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. p. 113. ISBN 978-0-226-11292-3〕 and the correct placement of mammoth's tusks would still be a matter of debate into the twentieth century.〔For example, E. Pfitzenmayer, A Contribution to the Morphology of the Mammoth, Elephas Primigenius Blumenbach; With an Explanation of My Attempt at a Restoration, ''Annual report of the Board of Regents of the Smithsonian Institution'' (1907), p. 326-34.〕 Adams' account of his journey was published in late 1807 and soon translated into other European languages and circulated throughout Europe and the Americas. Tilesius made a set of etchings of his reconstruction and sent them other naturalists to examine〔Benjamin Smith Barton, "Letter from Doctor Benjamin Smith Barton to Mr. Jeff'ersont dated Blue Ridge, vicinity of Paris, Virginia, July 13, 1810," ''The Port folio,'' Vol. 4 (1810), p. 340.〕 while he worked on a detailed report of the skeleton which was finally published in 1815.〔 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「Adams mammoth」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|